Political Herpes

Just another WordPress.com site

Posts Tagged ‘taqiyya

Should America support Israel?

leave a comment »

By Annie Hamilton

Israel’s right to exist, to occupy their land is a right that is entrenched in historic relevance.  
Israel existed right up until the time of the Roman Empire. When the Romans conquered the land, Jews were permitted to live there.

There are two periods where they were effectively forced from their property, the first time in 70 A.D. and the other sometime around 135 A.D.

There’s always been a Jewish presence in Israel and for hundreds of years; the Middle East was easily the most peaceful part of the World.

Some have forgotten that Rahm Emanuel arranged meetings between Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat back in the early nineties and during this exchange, Jewish leaders expressed the need to create a Palestinian government to remove the rapidly expanding Palestinian population away from Israeli hands.

The pressing concern of ‘the day’ was Israel’s inevitable destruction and as such the situation must be handled immediately to manage any potential hostile presence in the region.

This seemed agreeable to Israel although it’s not been terribly smooth. (A peace agreement including both sides of the Gaza along with the United States of America)

Obviously following incidents in the late nineties as well as September 11th, Israel has remained steadfast in reliability with America struggling to define and contain threats, global and domestic pertaining to hostile enemies from within the Palestinian and other Islam-based territories.

Now we’re under a different Administration that still includes Emmanuel, oddly enough and things have never been worse.

We have a Muslim President who lied his way into the oval office and since then has appointed several fellow Muslims, radical Marxists, Socialists or other unsavory characters that have effectively dismantled our founding papers since 2008.

This Administration lies to the American people and ridicules our allies while bowing to Islamist leaders, something never done in the history of America, turning the United States Presidency into a mockery, something to be laughed at, no longer respected. Yet, all things considered, Israel must be reckoned with, a formidable force.

Why should the US support Israel? I can give you two solid reasons.

Israel commands the strongest military presence in the Middle East and America would be wise to continue considering Israel a strong ally and perhaps working a little harder on that relationship (perhaps not forcing Bibi to use the servants entrance during meetings at the White House?)

If the powers in Washington had operational brain cells, perhaps they’d use their resources to neutralize Iran’s capacity to maintain nuclear weapons, (yes they have them)

Israel is fundamentally part of the United States’ fabric, part of who we are as a people.

(When the current undocumented President announced that we’re a ‘Muslim’ Nation, he was obviously off of his meds, for we could be nothing farther from)

Our founding draws on the uniquely Hebrew concept of the holiness of the individual and love for the vulnerable. We’re connected for this and other reasons and our destinies and welfare will always be connected, never to be separated.

In many ways, the sacredness of both lands reflect upon one another and must not be banished from political exercise, religion, public life or any other action.

Liberals and their universalism demands that Israel make concessions to appease Arabs but this rarely appeases anyone and the truth is that there is plenty of room for Arabs in other areas and Israel must be left alone at this point.

This Administration’s betrayal of Israel is both shocking and disheartening and exposes the range of evil and/naïve thinking in the people in today’s government AND media who seem to not understand (or care) what is truly at stake right now.

This immoral behavior should disturb us all


Written by anniehamilton805

September 3, 2010 at 5:26 am

Line in the Sand

leave a comment »

We have come to a place in our nation’s history where it is prudent to define who we are as people, a country, and as a culture. The United States was founded on traditional values, including the freedom to practice one’s own religious beliefs, including nothing, should one desire. Our Founding Fathers could not agree on these matters and as such, they left it up to each individual state.

Just as imperative, we must address the passionate unraveling this administration has elected to take on with lusty fervor of our constitutional papers, Bill of Rights, respect for other people, a very basic “creed” of standards that revere regardless of whether their political views stem from.
As a lover of Thomas Jefferson’s readings, I can understand why Obama and friends would want to separate themselves from these documents as much as possible as they have so little in common.

A few blurbs to refresh your memory:

*And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude.
*Never spend your money before you have it.
*Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.
*Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
*In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution.

As of late, this has become a largely endangered practice that we’ve seen become threatened more and more and as world events have indicated around us, it would seem that it’s time to turn our attention to the writing on the brightly colored wall that is desperately seeking our attention now. Where have we gone wrong and what can we do (if anything) to turn this situation around?

*Warning sign missed (from my perception) our spiritual leaders and institutions have gone soft.

Case in point:  Notre Dame inviting Obama to their ceremonies despite his miserable stance on abortion and their own historical viewpoint on this delicate subject?  And I cannot tell you how many times I’ve pulled into the parking lot on a Sunday morning only to see ‘Obama 08’ Stickers on the back of people’s cars and vans. 
Certainly, they’re entitled to an opinion but my question would be this: what believing person, Jew or Christian would attend a service and support an institution that would willingly endorse a candidate, knowingly or not, that publicly states that his first intention is to remove ALL restrictions off of all abortion altogether?
And if you’re unaware of this, you have your head in the sand. Sorry to be harsh but ignorance is NO EXCUSE.
He only repeated this like a broken record throughout his entire campaign, people and it’s, I believe, the first order he signed. (at least he’s true to his word, right?) but he’s a amoral and hence, has no place in the White House.
*Next, he took large pay outs from the financial institutions and then cried foul during the banking scandals. This highly inappropriate. If you’re going to do something like this, at least stand behind your people. Be accountable when you’re caught AND when they’re caught. So…he’s a scum bag with no backbone. That makes him a weasel on top of that. Typical of the Chicago political machine. They have no loyalty even unto themselves. Anyone recall the St. Valentine’s Day massacre. The Chicago “political MOB is no different.”

*There are countless court cases tying Obama’s birth certificate mystery up in the California Supreme Court as well as the testimony of his Grandmother and people trying to uncover his college transcripts. People (including myself) wanting answers about this person’s past.
We don’t know anything about this person – he claims to be a Christian which is laughable since Black Liberation Theology is a warped version of the gospels and has little connection with real Judeo-Christian theology.
Then consider this, three people from his church were killed execution style over the past couple of years and at least one person, and rumors in Chicago have continued to float that tie Obama to two of them in a sexual way. Again, they are just rumors, but it does prove my point that the man has more shadows to him than we are aware of and that Chicago politics is very dirty, they do tend to feed on their own when convenient. If someone wanted to take him down politically or twist The Manchurian Candidates arm, there is likely enough ammo in his past to make it happen.
Who is he? Is he qualified and eligible to be the leader of the free world? Why is he hiding so many secretive documents? If they are no big deal, why the refusal now in coming forth with them? Is it because they might explain his foreign aid received during his college years?
We DO have a right to know! It’s time to come forth and explain these things to the American people.
Bernard Madoff has been touted the “greatest thug of all time” in political and money blogs over the past several weeks but I must adamantly disagree. It’s Obama and Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and the others who continue to perpetuate and this giant scam they’ve pulled off with the American Reinvestment Act, they are all ripping off the masses while praying at the feet of Obama.

They’ve signed away the country to the “Slum Monkey Trillionaire” who is is unraveling our beautiful country, piece by piece, using our constitution like it’s old toilet paper, and why should he care? He has nothing to lose! As a matter of fact, he doesn’t even hold the deed to his own home and adjoining property, Rezko the slum lord in Chicago does.
Add to this that Obama is very cozy with George Soros and his Joyce Foundation among his other assorted organizations. What kind of a person would be so proud to associate with a man like Soros who has made efforts to put banks and other financial institutions in default to earn himself money at the risk of its common depositors and employees?
Many people are asleep, refusing to see that Obama their teleprompter dependent President is good at making speeches that say NOTHING. He’s a fertilizer salesman and he’s good at spreading it around and the people he associates with have seemingly crawled up from the depths of the same cess pool.
He takes from the earning and gives to the wanting and demanding, not to the needy, not to the poor, not to hard working people with a dream. He is a flim-flam man, a con artist, a shyster and at least 53% of the American people are asleep and not paying attention. They don’t understand that we are close to losing the freedoms our fore fathers worked so hard to instill in all of us.

The right to own a gun for instance, it’s not a privilege, it’s a RIGHT. It’s the second amendment. And they’re working to remove it. We can’t let this happen. It’s up to us as Americans to speak up and tell them that it is not going to happen.
God expects us to stand up and do what is right – period.
We need people to set examples, to use their voices, to NOT be like Michael Steele and Meghan McCain – always looking for the next open mic, rolling video cam, conference call or talk show to get their face or voice on. Besides they are way too politically correct, and have little to no real backbone or at least the one they have is twisted in the wrong direction and weak. Might win an election but it shows no manner of deeper convictions.

In my opinion, Meghan McCain frankly could take a lesson from famous blonde conservative shark, Ann Coulter or conservative female gun activist Rosanna Pulido. And if Michael Steele wants a black conservative mentor, I would suggest he listen to Larry Elder or Lt. Col. Allen West. Their grasp of the issues and how to move the country forward speak volumes to all and not just those who seem to be enamoured with the glitz and glamour of a TV studio.
Give me a Rush, Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Boortz, or a Beck any day over someone afraid to speak their mind and be honest about the issues and let their “yes” be “yes” and “no” be “no” even if it’s unpopular.
It’s perfectly okay to be critical of the President, it is way past time we tip the scales in the right direction, turn the tables, and upset the left. They have done nothing to improve life in America and instead acted irresponsibly for years, not just since the day “HE” was elected.
It is time for strategic thought, tactical voices, deeply heartfelt Judeo-Christian convictions and physical activity; the line is already in the sand, it is time to step over it boldly, get busy and take our country back

Why so many continue to misunderstand Islam

leave a comment »

Don’t be deceived by Muslims’ Tayyiqa.

by DrThomas Ahmed on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 10:48am
additional note: to order the Islamic trilogy: Hadiths, Sira, Qur’an in ENGLISH in its’ entirety, please log onto http://www.PoliticalIslam.com
Many people make the mistake of trying to understand Islam by reading the Qur’an alone. Muslims succeeded in convincing large number of non-Muslims that Islam can be found only in the Qur’an. They argue that the sunna or the hadiths of the prophet Muhammad are not always reliable sources of Islam because there are authentic and unauthentic sunna or hadiths. If you fall into that trap then you cannot establish any valid arguments against the teachings of Islam on terrorism and the abuse of women. 75% of the teachings of Islam on those two topics come from the hadiths. Therefore, Islam is to learn about the life, teachings, and wars of the prophet Muhammad. In other words to understand the core teachings of Islam is to know Muhammad from the time he was born until he breathed his last breath.  

In order to know Muhammad you need to read his biography, hadiths, the Qur’an, and commentaries on the Qur’an. The hadith is what Muhammad taught and did. The hadiths and the Qur’an are two faces to one coin. Both are believed to be the words of Allah. The hadith is believed to be nothing short of revelation [for the Qur’an says of Muhammad] `he does not speak out of low desires. It is not but inspiration inspired” (Qur’an Surah al-Najim 53: 3-4). The only difference between the Qur’an and the hadith is that whereas the former was revealed directly through the angel Gabriel with the very letters that are embodied by Allah, the latter was revealed without letters and words” (Haqq & Newton 1996: 1). The Qur’an strongly testifies to the importance and the authenticity of the hadith and doesn’t allow Muslim men and women to choose between the two: “Whenever Allah and the Apostle have decided a matter, it is not for a faithful man or woman to follow a course of their own choice” (Qur’an al-Ahzab 33: 36).  

The biography of Muhammad contains his marriage life, wars, and teachings about various topics. There are four well-known biographies of Muhammad written by Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Hisham, Bihaqi, Tabari, and Ibn Sa’ad. The earliest of those biographies was written by Ibn Ishaq which was lost and only quotations of it could be found in the other four biographies. Again none of those biographies can give you everything about Muhammad. You need to read all of them to get full story of Muhammad. For example, the famous story of the satanic verses could not be found in the widely accepted biography of Muhammad by Ibn Hisham.  

There are nine collections of the hadiths of the prophet Muhammad accepted by the Sunni sect (85% of Muslims are Sunnis)– Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunnan Abu Dawud, Sunnan Al-Tirmizi, Muttwa Malik, Musnad Ahmad, Sunnan al-Nasa’i, Sunnan Ibn Majah, and Sunnan al-Darami. There are 600.000 hadiths. After editing them the Muslim scholars reduced the number of the hadiths to 60.000 hadith. This big number of the hadiths are scattered in a chaotic fashion in those accepted collections of the sayings and deeds of Muhammad. You can get all these 60.000 hadiths in something called Mishakat Al-Masaabih. Al-Bukhari included 7275 hadith in his Sahih, many of which were variants of others with different chains of transmission. Of these, 2712 were not duplicates. It was reported that he had originally collected 600,000 hadith before subjecting them to his critical method. The method that he used was emotional and religious rather than academic. He used to pray and then ask Allah after his prayer to give him peace in his heart and on that basis he would determine whether the hadith is acceptable or not. He did not use any intellectual or academic method except his prayers and beliefs. Sahih Muslim included 9,200 hadith, of which 4,000 were not duplicated. Originally, he had collected 300,000 hadith. Out of these 300,000 only 9200 met his criteria of authenticity. Muslim used the same method that al-Bukhari followed in his selection of what to include and not to include in his collection.  

It is impossible to read and understand the Qur’an without reading the four accepted commentaries written by Ibn Kathir, Al-Quortobi, Al-Tabari, and Al-Jalalin. Besides that you need to read the nine collections of the hadiths and the four biographies of Muhammad to know what the Qur’an is meant by every verse and every Sorah. Moreover, no commentator would give you a clear-cut explanation of a particular verse or passage in the Qur’an. The commentary gives the views of at least ten to fifteen Companions of the prophet on that verse and it is up to you which one you would like to choose. (And there is something very important you need to keep in mind while you are trying to learn Islam; you must grasp the theory of abrogation to help you bridge the gap between the huge contradiction of the Makkan verses which granted freedom of faith and the Medinian verses which denied freedom of choice and made Islam compulsory for every infidel if he wanted to escape the death and save the honor of his family and protect his wealth and property).  

The most difficult of all the above is the task of trying to know the Shari’a Law. Shari’a is the body of legal rulings that defines how a Muslim man/woman should behave in all circumstances wherever he/she lives. The main sources of the Shari’a laws are the Qur’an and the hadiths. Those laws are formed by the founders of the four legal schools of Islam – Shafi’, Maliki, Hanifi, and Hanbali.     

Accordingly, you need over twenty years of rigorous studying and researching to read the writings of the five biographers, the nine collections of the hadiths, the four commentaries of the Qur’an, and the works of the four founders of the Shari’a schools. I began my journey in learning Islam and comparing it with other religions in 1986 and finished my last degree in 2009. During this long period I obtained two Bachelor degrees, two Master degrees, and a (PhD) Doctorate degree in philosophy and religious studies. Therefore, it took me over twenty years to learn Islam and still I can’t claim that I have finished my study of it. However, I can correctly claim that I have learned a great deal of it and that enabled me to write twelve books on the issues of Muslim women and the teachings of Islam on terror. Accordingly, I invite you to look into my writings and that may save you the troubles of going through those huge volumes which most of them are in Arabic language and have not yet been translated into English or any other Western languages. Information on how to view my books is listed below.  

“Irshad and the Abuse of Muslim Women”  http://www.publishamerica.net/product90819.html  

“Ibtihal and Muslims’ Liberation Movement” http://www.publishamerica.net/product56703.html  

“THE HIDDEN LIFE OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD” http://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Life-Prophet-Muhammad/dp/1425905714/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1230517064&sr=1-1  

“Insaaf: A Story of an Arab Girl” http://www.amazon.com/Insaaf-Story-Arab-Girl-Ahmed/dp/1414000707/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1230705999&sr=1-1  

“Intisar: A Story of a Muslim Girl” http://www.amazon.com/Intisar-Story-Muslim-Girl-Ahmed/dp/1403306273/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1230704235&sr=1-1  

Diana Stone wrote: “Dr. Ahmed, I’m reading your book, Ibtihal and Muslims’ Liberation Movement. You did an outstanding job of providing more information about Islam in one book than I have read anywhere. Writing it in a novel format made it easier to understand and retain the information. It’s a massive volume you must have spent years working on it”.  


Diana Stone wrote again, “”Folks, I’m reading this book. It’s a wonderfully written and very informative book, written in a novel format, about Islam. It is a scholarly work of almost 700 pages. If you want to learn more about this religion and read it in an interesting format, this is the book. And know, I am not getting paid for advertising!”.